Comments (30)

By Katie Kish, September 14, 2009 10:08 am

Posts are coming in from all over the place about Justin, his man blog, CFI-Canada and democracy. As per usual Zak is an asshole (he’s usually an asshole, right…but an asshole), Joe breaks it down unbiased and sensible style and Gordo makes me want to pee my pants laughing so hard but at the same time hitting the nail on the head. But then there is Ian Bushfield, who as first you want to be like “hahahaha…” but then you’re like “haha..ha….h…….a…oh, that’s not funny at all, because it’s so true.” And then there is this new site….which is starting to look pretty interesting…

As the pres of the Freethought Association of Canada I really feel like I need to just stay out of all of it. But that’s not really true Katie Kish fashion, (but keep in mind these are my opinions, NOT FAC’s!!) despite the fact that Justin himself asked me to stay out of it. I think that really goes to show how problematic this all really is.

It breaks down to two issues, in my opinion. The first is the future and sustainability of The Center For Iquiry in Canada and the second is multi-cause leadership. …So here are my unedited (its getting late in the morning and I have a class to go to) thoughts about what is going on.

Zak points out that a democracy in CFI is pretty much a delusion and says this:

“So, until more people get involved and more money can be raised, it’s likely Justin won’t be going anywhere, nor should he since we don’t yet have anyone with the experience or dedication willing to replace him.”

There are a couple problems here. The first is that Justin isn’t the only person. As someone who worked for CFI I’ve seen a lot of people come and go. People who are dedicated, who don’t mind putting hours at a time into CFI and who would gladly take Justin’s spot coordinating CFI Ontario. He isn’t irreplaceable at CFI Ontario. I think in the media, he is pretty irreplaceable, but that’s just because Im terrified of writing for things like Holy Post and going on the Michael Coren show so in my eyes, anyone that does that is amazing.

I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again and again and again. There are people in Toronto who want to work for CFI, if given the chance, they would apply. But this is all besides a very important point. …Justin founded CFI Ontario 3 years ago. How many consistent volunteers are there? Why hasn’t he found people that can hold up CFI as a place? 3 years of being the leading secular voice in Canada is a long time. And while I’ve seen a lot of people get involved, I’ve seen just as many who would have been firm and solid volunteers leave because of the way CFI is run. If I talk to those people and ask if it is okay to use their names I’ll do a follow up something to back this point up.

The Center for Inquiry – Ontario is not sustainable right now. There aren’t enough volunteers to do stuff (when I was working there I had to pull teeth to get 2 or 3 people show up to help me with an event.), the actual building is a mess and does NOT look like a think tank organization’s major building in Canada should…, the structure doesn’t allow for democratic processes even for the board of directors and I’ve seen unanimous decisions by the CFI general volunteers completely overturned by Justin single handedly.

So you may ask “Well, Katie, if you’re so concerned why aren’t you there being one of the pillar volunteers that you think CFI really needs to be sustainable?”… Well imaginary question asker, I’ll tell you, as this is my point number 2.

Some causes are controversial and some are not. It takes a moron to not understand why one cause might be more controversial than an other. Because of the previous issue Justin is pretty much the only face of atheism in Canada. I’ve been on a few national media outlets, but Justin has been on them all. And this is amazing. He speaks for secularists (agnostics, atheists, secular humanists, freethinkers, …) on a regular basis on national media outlets regularly. Its been amazing, he’s given a face to secularists and our efforts in Canada. He’s also founded most of the major secular players in Canada and really rallied up the Campus groups. Woohoo!

So lets google, Mr. Trottier, to see ALL of his accomplishments! …What is this? He has a personal blog?! Cool!

What? … I can’t say it better than other people have:

“words like “whiny” and “complaining” are throwbacks to old gendered stereotypes about big mouthed bitches who don’t know their place.”

“About the quote mining do I really need to point … Read moreout how intellectually dishonest it is?”

“I’m disappointed that at how ideologically driven your comments are especially considering that you are supposed to be the executive director of a secular humanist organization (CFI) that promotes critical thinking. Many of us have been having a hard time keeping CFI going in Canada in light of your misogynistic views Justin and we aren’t even the ones getting paid. I’d suggest that if this is really the path you want to follow that you do us a favour and resign for the good of the organization.”

“Justin: If people who don’t like your views are leaving, and those who find your blog and agree and then follow to CFI join, doesn’t that tend toward an ideologically narrow CFI?”

“I’m not saying he can’t speak, but as head of an organization he has to understand that his words are damaging to the reputation of that organization. So if he wants to say these things, and remain head honcho of CFI, then he’ll need to accept that many may leave.”

A letter written by a previous volunteer on June 6th 2009:

Hello all, please read below.

“Among cancers which affect both sexes, men are 60% more likely to develop the disease and 70% more likely to die from it. “we were surprised to see such consistent differences.” “Gee, now why would men think their health less valuable than women? All they see are “Women’s hospitals”, immigrant women’s health buses paid for by the government, and the highly publicly funded Women’s Health Network? Shocking!… Read more
and:
“Living in an epoch that is selfish as well as matriarchal, our lifeboats are no longer marked “women and children first,” only “women first.” We invent euphemisms, such as “choice” for killing, and sophomoric dilemmas, such as pretending not to know when life begins, to ensure that nothing hinders Virginia’s quest for Santa Claus. No obstacle must interfere with her goal of self-fulfillment — least of all an issue (as it were) of her healthy sexual appetite.
Some put the question in terms of a woman’s right toher own body. That would be valid enough in the realm of smoking, diet, liposuction or sex — but abortion? Abortion means controlling someone else… Read more’s body. Incidentally, I realize that as a man I have no authority to speak on the matter, but I’m not speaking as a man. I wouldn’t dare. I’m speaking strictly as an ex-fetus.”

Heya. The above quotes are a sample of what Justin Trottier, spokesperson for CFI Canada, and also spokesperson for http://www.equalismactivism.com/, is posting on his facebook page.

I wanted to make you all aware that someone who speaks for CFI, an organization that promotes science and reason, is also speaking publicly in support of what I consider regressive, sexist positions and policies. In addition, we skeptics continually discuss possible ways to get women more involved in the skeptical community. I’m pretty sure this … Read moreisn’t the best way to go about it. As most of you know, his outspoken positions are the primary reason why I’ve stepped away from formal association with CFI.

I support everyone’s right to free speech, and these samples are from Justin’s personal FB account, not a CFI forum. However, Equalism Activism is a public website with Justin’s picture on the home page. In an ideal world, people would be able to separate the two. It is not an ideal world. In fact, when you google Justin’s name, Equalism Activism is the second hit.

I’m not suggesting that any of you do anything about this, just that you be aware. If CFI Alberta becomes successful in its quest to be the one-stop critical thinking shop for this province, it will only be a matter of time until some intrepid reporter asks about CFI’s opinion on Justin’s positions. You should be ready for it.

In Skeptical Solidarity,

d

Aaaand more quotes:

“When people see, read, or hear about Justin, they think CFI, and vice versa. That`s basic branding. And this, then, is a PR nightmare for all of us.”

“This post illustrates exactly what’s wrong with this blog. This is a manipulative and misleading story (which isn’t surprising for the Star) which could have been exposed with about 10 minutes of research (which is how long it took me).”

“I think Justin needs to choose his cause. I agree that it is not good strategically to be heavily involved (let alone leading) two different activist causes, especially such controversial ones.”

“ I`m not sure how it could be, when the author of a blog allows the kinds of things in that Denis Prager post to remain on his blog, especially after it was repeatedly made clear to him that Prager is condoning marital rape, using highly sexist (against women AND men) stereotypes to `prove`his point. Justin, as the owner of the blog, is also the editor, yet he to this day has not even thought twice about the content of that post or any other. If you take a quick glance at almost all of the other posts … Read morein that section, you will also see his penchant for picking and choosing quotes that seem to fit his ideological argument, and ignore the actual facts and or real life subtleties within them.”

“Will: that was one of many posts where Justin’s use of citations/sources were called into question, along with his polemical misrepresentations of complex legal issues, see:

http://www.equalismactivism.com/?p=1067… Read more
and
http://www.equalismactivism.com/?p=849

for just two examples.”

Now how about some of my favorite quotes from Justin’s blog… starting with women should have sex, even if they don’t want to, because…like…come on! its just like taking out the trash, man!

“Allow me to summarise. In these two columns Dennis Prager presents the argument that a wife who cares about having a happy husband rethinks the idea that if she is not in the mood then that means she must not have sex. Prager shines a light on the differences between men and women, sex is far more important to men than it is to women and that a man knows his wife loves him by the fact that she has sex with him. Does mood always determine our actions? No. Are you always in the mood to get up and go to work in the morning? Are you ever in the mood to get up in the night and feed the baby? Take out the trash? Sometimes we have obligations to do things that we don’t feel like doing because they lead to good consequences down the road.”

This one makes me LOL, because we buy nothing for men…and so we have to pick, diamond rings and spoils or pay equality, not both.:

“She [justin's girlfriend] finished before me and while I was having my haircut completed, she was asked by the hairdresser if she wished to pay for herself or to wait. And the wink that followed was to mean that waiting would have the advantage that I, the male, would then be obliged to pay for both my haircut and that of my girlfriend’s. Tell me why women ought to have pay equality if they are to have purchased for them diamond rings, dinners and haircuts?”

Ya know what women! You man THINK you’re making progress! But really, its the men still making decisions for you! Mwa hahah…err. wait… isn’t that supposed to be teh OPPOSITE arguement of his blog:

“One last reminder to those feminists who like to pat themselves on the back and tell each other that they and they alone are responsible for women’s progress.  All 9 Justices deciding Roe V. Wade were male.”

I can’t read anymore of it….The truly sad thing is that Justin has some really important issues raised on his blog. Men face sexism. Men work in high risk jobs. Men need birth control. Men often get screwed over in custody battles. Men have a higher suicide rate. Men lack support groups. But it’s all accompanied with ignorant comments about women and feminism. With an egotistical overtone that is really not helpful to anyone’s cause. If someone is going to be the face of any one cause or controversial organization – they shouldn’t try to pick up another. Especially one that alienates people. If I were the face of atheism/secularism in Canada…I wouldn’t be so active in my environmental things, I would stick to one cause if I was that prominent of a figurehead.

Justin thinks no one has left CFI because of his blog. I think it’s time we all stopped dancing around the issue. I don’t work with The Center for Inquiry – Canada, because I don’t agree with Justin’s other main cause. Actually, that’s not even fair. I support men’s rights. I DON’T support women bashing, grossly biased commentary about men’s issues, men’s issues trumping women’s issues, nit picking at articles because there is no “male voice” when there doesn’t need to be one, picking statistics that on their own support an argument but don’t in an overall sense, taking away women’s rights to give men rights and finally having the face of Canadian secularism association with all of these things. It is not healthy for CFI. And CFI IS losing volunteers despite what Justin would like to think. Myself and my hubby (John Xu) were very active at CFI and in campus groups. Neither of us are involved with CFI and campus groups now because of this issue. I know there are others, but we’re the only two I can really speak for. Hopefully other people start speaking up.

I wouldn’t be so upset, but I’ve heard and witnessed horror stories surrounding this issue.

Justin declining an interview from the CBC and accusing them of being sexist because they asked to interview me, instead of him???

Justin sending a response to a rape victim applying for a position within CFI saying that she is sexist and unprofessional because she has experience at women’s groups on her resume???

In my interview to work at CFI questioning the validity and necessity of my work as the women’s collective coordinator with a radio station?? Women are highly underrepresented on radio, men don’t need a specific group, they’re already the majority.

Telling me we can’t put “Equal opportunity” on our social service brochure because it’s sexist???

Using CFI contacts to promote his “equalism” blog???

Not allowing Debbie Goddard to come and do her talk on multiculturalism and gender at CFI because he doesn’t agree with the topic so he makes us do a panel with inexperienced panelists instead???

Having signs up in his cubical at CFI saying he supports men’s rights and a bumper stick about male bashing in the media???

UGH.

/Fin.

Comments (2)

By Katie Kish, December 29, 2008 3:29 pm

Justin and I have started a blog…I haven’t really written anything for it. Mostly because I’m at a loss for what to write. Is gender even an issue that I’m willing to go up against? Is it an issue that even is worthy of our time? How clear cut is everything?

Feminism has a long and drawn out history. Feminist scholars divide the movement into three distinct “waves” of thought and action. The first and second waves, the ones we really needed, are associated with women’s suffrage and women’s liberation in the way of legal and social equality. Third wave is a supposed reaction to the failures of second wave feminism which began in the 1990′s. So…The Margret Sanger’s, Susan B Anthony’s and E C Stanton’s of the first wave got women the vote in the early 1900′s. Bettry Friedan got women to think outside of the kitchen, and made it alright for us to do so. And third wave feminism gave us all a headache. And now we’re left with a mix of faux-third wave feminists who argue over which feminism is better and some post-feminists who appreciate everything that’s be done…but would like people to move on now.

Its hard to do a quick description of an over all “man’s movement”. There is the father’s right movement and the overall examination of masculinities – but no real concrete movement such as feminism.

So what’s left? Women seem to more terrified to walk through dark allies. While boys have a higher chance of being abused as children. Both genders have unreal stereotypes to attempt to live up to as the media tells us all what the ideal look and personality of all of us should be.

The size of media men keep getting bigger and bigger. Batman as Adam West wasn’t nearly as defined and gigantic and seductive as when Batman was George Clooney or Val Kilmer. As time progresses the guns get bigger too. Humphrey Bogart’s gun was simply an accessory to the man where as Rambo and the Terminator are men as an accessory to the guns and muscles.

Then you get suburban middle class white kids who need immediate respect, and this is show via the media to be violence easily brought on by a gun. This is a horribly narrow and destructive up bringing. The American high school shootings that we’ve seen throughout the past few years have been played out by the kids who couldn’t fit into this “tough” role. Pearly Mississippi, Red Lake Minnesota, Springfield Oregon, Columbine, The Trench Coat Mafia… all these words/places connect to school shootings that were carried out by “loners” or boys who just couldn’t fit in and be the tough, big or cool guy. These killers attempted social integration and failed. The next easiest way to gain respect and to adjust their social standing from being the wuss, pussy, loser or freak was to become the master of violence and the killer for the toughest guy in the world can become scared at gun point. They weren’t big strong and muscular, but guns had that ability and they got that grotesque respect.

Father’s have issues when it comes to divorce, there is often sexism in the court room. Women still can’t enter into a man’s world, such as a factory, retain their femininity and still get respect – she has to put on the bitch face. Men hit women, a lot. And women hit men quite a bit too. Men are shipped off to war and women are raped much more frequently.

There has been a very strong need for feminism in the past. And now – I’d say that the need for feminism is deteriorating. Is life equal yet? Absolutely not, but it probably never will be. The posts that Justin has written here have really focused on men as a victim. Men as needing the next feminist movement. At this point in the history of human beings focusing on one sex is no longer acceptable, it’s as sexist as it gets. Cherry picking statistics and attempting to make men look severely victimized in a society where they have been on top (and really…still are on top) for centuries is simply ludicrous.

Gender equality isn’t perfect yet, and it likely never will be. The fact that we’re already 2 separate groups, with a very small percentage of the population blurring the line between being a man and a woman, makes it impossible for there to be true social equality. As long as the media is perpetuating stereotypes and making money off of doing so – it will continue. There is a divide between men and women, and there always will be. Some things women will be better at, and other things men will be.

There are differances that we have to live with. …There are differences that we dont have to live with. …I dont know.

Comments (8)

By Katie Kish, May 10, 2007 12:47 am

Watch the video:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGLHlvb8skQ[/youtube]

…Besides the obvious sexual stereotyping, the normalization of being “tough” (tough enough to throw a car over a bridge) and the women being seen as weak… this is just unhealthy crappy food.

The men refuse to eat healthy foods because that’s just for chicks. In one of the ads in this set there is even an appearance of a Hummer that displays manly behavior and validates one of the men as being a real man.

This promotes unhealthy eating habits and stupid gender stereotypes. The last thing that men need nailed into their brains is that eating a greasy 1000 calorie hunk of disgusting meat validates them as a man. The excuse of those who made the ads as quoted in Consumer Reports was “We feel comfortable that consumers will not make diet choices based on seeing a 30 second humorous commercial” … Well, I hate to tell you this, but that’s what ads are for.

Whether this is meant to be funny or over looked you have to consider the facts. 30% of Americans are clinically obese while 38% of them have some form of cardiovascular disease. A whopping 71% of American men are over weight. Considering statistics like that, it might not be such a horrible idea to put the Burger King away and chow down on some carrot sticks. Forget what “other men” might think of you and consider your health and your body.

Comments (1)

By Katie Kish, April 19, 2007 2:30 pm

…First it was Columbine, then Virginia Tech. What’s next?With unthinkable atrocities occurring these days with increasing frequency and
intensity, we must ask ourselves, what’s changed in our culture that allows such
needless and senseless tragedies to occur?To put it simply: People imitate pop culture and pop culture lacks morals and now pop culture has come home to roost.

This is not to say that everyone who sees a violent film will act out violently but
it is undeniable that the stars we emulate and the films we watch can have strong influence on us.

One solution to this problem is for moral Americans to take back the movie industry for the good of our nation and our youth, the future leaders of our nation.

So, what does it take for Hollywood to “repent” and start producing decent movies once again? Money. They need to see clean-cut films turn a profit. And that cannot happen unless decent people turn out to see decent films when they are released.

This was an e-mail that I got from a Mr. Tim Bueler. His solution to the Virginia Tech shooting is to start producing Christian movies, because you know – the movie Passion of the Christ had all of what? 20 minutes without violence? Oh, but he was dying for our sins. Right. Sorry.

My guess is that the VT shooter actually didn’t watch a whole lot of movies – but the sounds of things, he did a whole lot of nothing but school work before the massacre.

The definition of what a “man” is isn’t really ever discussed – but I really don’t think that the usual culprits of stereotyping, body image and personality were a factor here. Generally speaking men seek power through the use of a gun and taking the life of other people. In this case, I don’t think the violet behavior was spawned from “immoral” television or being tormented through all of high school for being a loser. It sounds more like it was his childhood that fucked him up.

I guess that’s why I’ve always been such a supporter of planned parenthood – in the sense that people are ready for the child, have been taught how to raise the child and feel emotionally stable enough to bring another person into the world.

Anyway – more christian movies aren’t going to stop school shootings. Christians kill too. And christian morals teach people to hate others who are not like them.

Edit: And actually, if you watch his video of his manifesto – there is already quite a bit of religion at the forefront of his mind.

Comments (6)

By Katie Kish, April 18, 2007 5:19 am

On: Geography, Vaginas, Men, The Environment, Gender Studies and Moving Across the Country! WOO!

There is a ton of stuff floating around the ‘sphere that I’ve totally been missing out on – but I can’t seem to sit myself down for long enough to write about all of it. …Exams are over (well I have one more, but its on Canadian Geography. Ha.) but the radio is bustin’ my butt.

However – that hasn’t stopped my head from spinning. READY!?

Read on!

Continue reading 'Thoughts and Commentary'»