They come in pink!!
I was getting a ride to work from a co-worker and pointed out Smart Car exclaiming how much I wanted one, he responded with a rant about how the Smart Car is worse for the environment than a Hummer. His basic reasoning was that a brand new factory had to be built in order to make the Smart Car.
To be completely honest I don’t have the numbers to prove it, but it seems fairly logical that a new factory would be off set rather quickly by people driving the cars, and taking their other cars off the road (which would have been replaced eventually anyway). I’ve looked all over for some numbers so I could do a full 25 year break down of it, but I can’t find them. The car only costs $12 000, not being expensive is more incentive to get one and it gets up to 68 mpg. It is most definitely helping the atmospheric environment.
You could argue that the factory is hypocritical because one had to be built for the Smart Car however, they are the most energy efficient factories ever built (by the standards of the EPA). The fact is that an international standard called the ISO 14001 aims to ensure that everything has a little impact on the environment as possible. The company was awarded the Environmental Certificate ISO 14001 for all of the measures they implemented with the factory. It was built on 30 hectares of industrial waste land. The land now contains the factory, accompanied by nature reserves with some of the most rare species of plant and animals. All of the materials used were checked against a list of potentially harmful materials and thus none contain formaldehyde or CFCs.
All of the facades are made out of a material that comes from a specific European tree that recovers quickly. The building is designed to catch rain water that can be used in the factory, any that isn’t caught by the actual building is drained into oil separation plants, treated and used. The water is treated to the point that it is up to European Drinking standards and is used for the gardens and coolant.
To save energy there are heat recovery systems located all over the building. The heat generated by the actual machines is recycled and “recovered” all through the building. All of the machines burn natural gas rather than the conventional fuels, the heat recovery system also helps to make the machines more energy efficent.
The car its self is painted using powder coating which is completely solvent free. The coat is actually thinner than the conventional ways of painting a car but it is also a higher quality of finish. The lack of solvent eliminates the fear of hazardous waste.
So yeah, they had to make a new factory. But they made one hell of a factory that produces cars that have such a low impact on the environment. The Hummer factories don’t take these environmental precautions, and the Hummer spews out disgusting amounts of emissions, and there is more material used to make them. The environmental degradation that happened because of the construction of an incredibly environmentally friendly factory isn’t even close to the degradation that would be caused by us a) never having fuel efficient cars and b) all driving Hummers. Therefore - I want a Smart Car.
And for those of you who say “it’s so small you wouldn’t be able to do anything, or fit anything in it…. watch this.




Where did you get all this data about the factory?! (Link!?)
And companies would never build a factory to build one specific car — it’s simply too cost ineffective. I’d imagine the fourtwo is only the first generation of car that this factory will produce.
Sorry, my bad about the links here is a list of the places I was getting info off of:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_(automobile)
http://www.clubsmartcar.ca/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1844&sid=00e905be2164786e01f28dba805d9eeb
http://www.kraussmaffei.co.uk/cref/dn.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartville,_Hambach,_France
http://www.tve.org/ho/doc.cfm?aid=305&lang=English
All the information is in those links. The factory was built specifically for Smart Cars. (See second last link)
The only place in the world where smarts are made is in Hambauch, France and the factories really are very energy efficient. There is more information about it on smart usa’s website, http://www.smartusa.com.
The smartest car is still a hundred thousand times worse than the dumbest bike.
well said brendan. i completely agree. …my bike is broken.
I think your friend just hs troubles visualizing the enormous scale of the auto industry. When you talk about the extra fuel, greenhouse gasses, road wear, and materials that go into putting together and running a hummer for 5 years and multiply that by tens of thousands of vehicles, you quickly find that the environmental cost of building a new factory is negligible. Especially if, as Eliza says, the factory building the smart car is more efficient.
Actually Gordo, what I’m talking about is the fact that the process of buying and making new cars isn’t the solution to this enormous fossil fuel problem we’re having. Hackneyed and cliched as it might seem, we need to develop long term sustainable community transportation, AND to rethink the way that we structure our lives around cars.
Buying a smart car is kind of like putting a band aid on a giant gash- technically, at a miniscule level, it’s helping- but if your concern stops at your purchase, you’re still going bleed to death… and worse, you may begin to confuse consumerism with activism. Often, trying to change the world by buying things isn’t really creating the change that companies convince us it is.